(However, the evident Links of London Charms of democracy is that it provides means of correcting wrong decisions, which is not the case with dictatorial regimes.) Therefore, a guardian should be appointed. These guardians consist of a small minority of people who are more advanced and enlightened than the rest of their society. If the organized -- armed -- bureaucracy allies itself with intellectuals to act as the guardian of society, then a tutelary system will be established while democracy operates on the surface. Even if a multi-party regime is Links of London Sweetie Bracelet With Marine Shell under the requirements of the time, this tutelary order will continue to operate over the democratically elected government. The National Security Council (MGK) was the military tutelage’s tool of direct intervention while the president acted as an indirect tool for such intervention, this time conducted via the Constitutional Court and the Higher Education Board (Y?K). When Abdullah Gül was elected president this critical tutelary tool was eliminated, which eventually created a crisis. Since “tutelage" is the name given to the control of the military and civilian ruling elites over the people elected by the people, those who talk about a “civilian tutelage" should explain what this phrase means. They should explain how the ruling Justice and Development Party’s (AK Party) tutelage operates. If the I-am-against-military-fascism-but-I-am-also-against-civilian-fascism dichotomy implies that such tutelage has been established over the Links of London Two Hearts Charm Red, then this is all nonsense. There is nothing more natural and correct than placing the military --which pokes its nose into every affair and continually commit faults -- under civilian control or tutelage.There is a plain truth that this absurd debate teaches us. The tutelary system is being torn to pieces in Turkey. The commander who sits in his office attended by an aide-de-camp outside the door or the journalists who discuss the lead story in an editorial meeting no longer have a chance of playing their tutelary roles. All of those who complain about “civilian tutelage" are those who have lost their positions as “guardians," aren’t they?If the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, is really scared that the Kurdish opening drive of the ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, was indeed aimed at liquidating itself, was panicked and that was why it has escalated its terrorist attacks, why is it that many people who do care for the national and Links of London U Charm integrity of Turkey have been so categorically opposed to the efforts of the government and accuse it of being in strides that might inflict great harm to the national and territorial unity of this country? If this country is obliged to try to provide a political resolution to the Kurdish problem through democratic openings and reforms that would satisfy the majority of the expectations of Turkey's ethnic Kurdish population and if the ruling AKP is trying for the past two years to undertake a Kurdish opening, why many people, including this writer, are so much critical of the efforts of the government?
Commentaires